Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸Ä¡ºÎ¿¡ ¹ßÄ¡ ÈÄ Áö¿¬ ½Ä¸³µÈ Ç¥ÁØ Á÷°æÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû, ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû Æò°¡

CLINICAL & RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION FOLLOWING DELAYED IMPLANTATION USING REGULAR DIAMETER IMPLANTS IN THE POSTERIOR REGION

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 35±Ç 5È£ p.335 ~ 339
ÃÖÁ¤¿ë, ÀÌ»óÈ­, À±ÇöÁß,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÁ¤¿ë ( Choi Jung-Yong ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼º¸ðº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÀÌ»óÈ­ ( Lee Sang-Hwa ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º¸ðº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
À±ÇöÁß ( Yoon Hyun-Joong ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼º¸ðº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic changes of regular diameter implants placed in the posterior region. A total of 47 standard diameter implants were consecutively placed in the posterior region of 20 partially edentulous patients. The diameters of the implants were 4.1mm (N=35, 74%) and 4.3mm (N=12, 26%), respectively. Peri-implant bone loss and clinical parameters such as mobility, suppuration, swelling, bleeding on probing (BOP) were evaluated at the baseline and?the final follow-up visit. The age of the patients ranged between 24~82 years (mean age: 54.7 years). The cumulative survival rate of the regular diameter implants loaded for a period of 3-24 months (Mean: 11.7¡¾7.9 month) was 100%. The average bone loss over the follow-up was 0.36¡¾0.67 mm. Success rate was 95.7%. Only two implants failed (bone loss exceeding 1mm after 1 year of placement). Some prosthetic complications occurred, such as screw loosening (N=1) and dissolution of cementation material (N=2). The present study describes successful outcome following the use of standard-diameter-implants placed in the posterior region, and further comprehensive maintenance practices and follow-up schedules are required.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implant;Regular diameter;Posterior region;Bone loss

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed